A lot of claims are made for the usefulness and trustworthiness of female intuition (whatever that might be). I was recently party to an online conversation where someone claimed that a woman’s first instinct was always right.

It’s such an extraordinary thing to think, never mind say, but what has really started to obsess me slightly is the idea of living it.

What would a (female, presumably) life look like if you behaved as though your first instinct was always right?

Who would your friends be (if anyone)? What job would you do? In fact, never mind a job, would you ever be able to get anything done?

Maybe I’m wrong to equate “instinct” with “first thing that pops into your head”.

Last night I watched an episode of Imagine about the Berlin Philharmonic on tour in Asia. It was a fascinating look inside an institution made up of highly talented and skilled people who must work together. One woman spoke about how her husband asked her why she bothered practising so much when nobody could actually hear her!

Her husband is both right and wrong – everyone in an orchestra is making a sound, else there would be no noise. In the case of the Berlin Philharmonic, each musician is (in theory at least) playing their instrument extremely proficiently. And yet when you listen to the piece they’re playing together, the individual musician is not often distinguishable.

There’s little individual glory in playing in an orchestra, even one as highly regarded as this one. The film exposed the extent to which these musicians were motivated by being part of an institution with a history, with a tradition of excellence. One of them said that conductors (in this case Simon Rattle) come and go, but the Berlin Philharmonic endures.

This points to a tension between the individual who makes his name and the collaborators who contribute almost anonymously.

In a world world where individualism reigns, reputation is crucial. But it’s more than reputation: it’s renown. People seek to become known for what they do beyond their own circle, because that (hopefully) puts them in a position where they can make money based on their name. Getting press can be as important in many fields as performing well.

But what about where people can make their living being part of something bigger than themselves? Many of the musicians interviewed spoke of having been outsiders throughout their lives and of how important was the sense of belonging they got from being members of the orchestra. The tradition of excellence and the history of the institution itself mattered to them. They were proud of being a part of this group and held themselves to very high standards in what they did.

For people who seek to belong to something bigger than themselves and who are motivated to work hard to contribute to a group endeavour, how can you create the conditions to inspire their loyalty and provide them with the sense of belonging and pride in what they do?

Some of the practices of the Berlin Philharmonic are very interesting in this regard: potential new members get to join on probation and are ultimately voted on by their peers who decide whether or not they get to stay on a permanent basis. The voting process also applies to the conductor – even the big star has to comply with the traditions of the orchestra and submit himself to the judgement of his peers.

Lawrence Lessig

networks Comments Off
Oct 042006

Lawrence Lessig

Lessig describes two economies – the commercial one, and the amateur/social/sharing/p2p economy.

Last week on Earshot we did a show about Telecommunciations Networks and the ways new technology is disrupting the current order and regulatory system. This is stuff I’m really interested in.

John spoke to Nicholas Economides of NYU’s Stern Business School, an expert in the Economics of Networks. I spoke to Brian Capouch of St. Joseph’s College in Indiana, an expert in Asterisk the open source telephony system.

Listen to Earshot

GigaOM : » Big Shifts In Internet Usage

Friendster lost steam. Is MySpace just a fad?

This is a great super-long blog entry cum essay by the super-smart Danah Boyd. She’s insightful on social software stuff. Heart.

GigaOM : » Social NOTworking

“Worse is Better” by Richard Gabriel – a sort of confusing treatise on the differences between the “worse is better” approach to writing code and the Stanford MIT model. Basically trying to get everything right first time is not as good as just getting something to work and then expanding it from there.

“The Cathedral and the Bazaar” by Eric Raymond – an interesting article about how open source programming works.

So for our group assignment this week Sean, David, Monica and I had to do a group study of Flickr. I’ve never used Flickr, except to look at other people’s pictures, mostly of TNO, so it was really interesting for me.

We were looking at how Flickr interacts with the “real world”, or the incursion of people’s real lives into what used to be called cyberspace. In a very fundamental way the sharing of pictures of yourself is an activity changes online bulletin board communities. Sometimes people feel compelled to show one another what they look like and it has an impact to find out what your online friends really look like. Flickr is a service based entirely on sharing picture of you and your life often including your friends. Although some people take pictures of beautiful things in nature, most contributors allow other users to learn about them and their lives.

Sean showed us the Memory Maps people have started making using pictures from Google Earth of places they know well. It’s a really beautiful idea – marking a satellite photograph and marking it with your own stories, your own identification with a place. It adds something that is neither real world, nor cyberspace but relies on both to exist. I wonder if people with memory maps of the same area ever find each other and compare notes? That would be sweet.

For Thinking About Networks this week Clay had us read “Wisdom of Crowds” by James Surowiecky. This article contains the following gem:

“James Shanteau is one of the country’s leading thinkers on the nature of expertise, and has spent a great deal of time coming up with a method for estimating just how expert someone is. Yet even he suggests that ‘experts’ decisions are seriously flawed”

Ha ha ha. This is the funniest thing I’ve read in a while. Neil Postman would have a field day with that.

However, the article does eventually redeem itself towards the end when it moves on to talking about how even a well-informed person’s decisions should be combined with those of others to reach a good final outcome.

I also read “Folksonomies – Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata” by Adam Mathes all about folksonomy, tagging, community catergorisation. Worth a read if you’re interested in the tagging thing, which I am, particularly in the context of putting VideoBlast together.

Finally, the great Terbo Ted the story of a Friendster addict. A must for anyone who once loved Friendster. It made me go back for the first time in months. I still think that Friendster touched on something really great – the ability to visualise your social network (or a part of it that was on Friendster) was delightful and could be useful. I love the idea of having Friendster to check into once a year or so to find out who is doing what in my friends of friends, who I see occasionally and like but will only ever keep up with on the grapevine. As an online grapevine, it is pretty cool I think.

© 2011 Dee Blind Mice Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha