For my Experimental Approaches to Non-Fiction Media class we’re reading Representing Reality by Bill Nichol. I’ve slaved through two chapters and I’m not sure how much more I can take.

The man clearly knows his stuff – every five pages or so he writes something really thought provoking and I’ve definitely learnt a good deal through what I’ve read. But did it really have to be so painful?

The book is written in the language of the academy – it’s unncecessarily dense and difficult to understand. It’s written for other academics who like being unintelligible to people who don’t spend their time reading tiresome pointless crap and building up a vocabulary of jargon and misapplied technical terms from other fields.

One of the reasons I left the academy in the first place was the necessity of reading shit like this. My eyes have been protesting the return of this kind of reading material – they have been steadfastly refusing to look at the page for more than a minute or so at a time.

Maybe his other book Blurred Boundaries will be something better.

Leave a Reply

(required)

(required)

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

© 2011 Dee Blind Mice Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha